Sunday, May 31, 2009

Grand Junction Solar Tour

June 06, 2009 11 am - 5 pm
Free to the public. Press Conference: 166 N. Cherry St., Fruita (home on tour) at 2pm
this event is for those people curious about what solar systems look like, how they work, what the return on investment is, or just want to “check out” how this technology can benefit them. High Noon Solar is offering a self-guided tour of 16 area residences and businesses across the Grand Valley that incorporate solar electric systems. High Noon Solar has partnered with MVM Mortgage Group and will have representatives at designated locations to answer solar and financing questions. Maps will soon be available on High Noon Solar’s website.
569 S. Westgate Drive, #4, CO
970-241-0209
www.HighNoonSolar.com

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Cost Of Installed Solar Photovoltaic Systems Drops Significantly Over The Last Decade

Cost Of Installed Solar Photovoltaic Systems Drops Significantly Over The Last Decade


A new study on the installed costs of solar photovoltaic (PV) power systems in the U.S. shows that the average cost of these systems declined significantly from 1998 to 2007, but remained relatively flat during the last two years of this period. (Credit: Image courtesy of DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

ScienceDaily (Mar. 3, 2009) — A new study on the installed costs of solar photovoltaic (PV) power systems in the U.S. shows that the average cost of these systems declined significantly from 1998 to 2007, but remained relatively flat during the last two years of this period.

Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) who conducted the study say that the overall decline in the installed cost of solar PV systems is mostly the result of decreases in nonmodule costs, such as the cost of labor, marketing, overhead, inverters, and the balance of systems.

“This suggests that state and local PV deployment programs — which likely have a greater impact on nonmodule costs than on module prices — have been at least somewhat successful in spurring cost reductions,” states the report, which was written by Ryan Wiser, Galen Barbose, and Carla Peterman of Berkeley Lab’s Environmental Energy Technologies Division.

Installations of solar PV systems have grown at a rapid rate in the U.S., and governments have offered various incentives to expand the solar market.

“A goal of government incentive programs is to help drive the cost of PV systems lower. One purpose of this study is to provide reliable information about the costs of installed systems over time,” says Wiser.

The study examined 37,000 grid-connected PV systems installed between 1998 and 2007 in 12 states. It found that average installed costs, in terms of real 2007 dollars per installed watt, declined from $10.50 per watt in 1998 to $7.60 per watt in 2007, equivalent to an average annual reduction of 30 cents per watt or 3.5 percent per year in real dollars.

The researchers found that the reduction in nonmodule costs was responsible for most of the overall decline in costs. According to the report, this trend, along with a reduction in the number of higher-cost “outlier” installations, suggests that state and local PV-deployment policies have achieved some success in fostering competition within the industry and in spurring improvements in the cost structure and efficiency of the delivery infrastructure for solar power.

Costs differ by region and type of system

Other information about differences in costs by region and by installation type emerged from the study. The cost reduction over time was largest for smaller PV systems, such as those used to power individual households. Also, installed costs show significant economies of scale. Systems completed in 2006 or 2007 that were less than two kilowatts in size averaged $9.00 per watt, while systems larger than 750 kilowatts averaged $6.80 per watt.

Installed costs were also found to vary widely across states. Among systems completed in 2006 or 2007 and less than 10 kilowatts, average costs range from a low of $7.60 per watt in Arizona, followed by California and New Jersey, which had average installed costs of $8.10 per watt and $8.40 per watt respectively, to a high of $10.60 per watt in Maryland. Based on these data, and on installed-cost data from the sizable Japanese and German PV markets, the authors suggest that PV costs can be driven lower through sizable deployment programs.

The study also found that the new construction market offers cost advantages for residential PV systems. Among small residential PV systems in California completed in 2006 or 2007, those systems installed in residential new construction cost 60 cents per watt less than comparably-sized systems installed as retrofit applications.

Cash incentives declined

The study also found that direct cash incentives provided by state and local PV incentive programs declined over the 1998-2007 study period. Other sources of incentives, however, have become more significant, including federal incentive tax credits (ITCs). As a result of the increase in the federal ITC for commercial systems in 2006, total after-tax incentives for commercial PV were $3.90 per watt in 2007, an all-time high based on the data analyzed in the report. Total after-tax incentives for residential systems, on the other hand, averaged $3.1 per watt in 2007, their lowest level since 2001.

Because incentives for residential PV systems declined over this period, the net installed cost of residential PV has remained relatively flat since 2001. At the same time, the net installed cost of commercial PV has dropped — it was $3.90 per watt in 2007, compared to $5.90 per watt in 2001, a drop of 32 percent, thanks in large part to the federal ITC.

Tracking the Sun: The Installed Cost of Photovoltaics in the U.S. from 1998–2007,” by Ryan Wiser, Galen Barbose, and Carla Peterman, may be downloaded as a PDF. The research was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Solar Energy Technologies Program) and Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (Permitting, Siting and Analysis Division), and by the Clean Energy States Alliance.


Adapted from materials provided by DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Show Me The Green

Who needs 100 days? By Day 93, better known the celebration of “Earth Day,” there was a lot to celebrate with a restored national commitment to protecting our economy and our natural places.

And while most of the press will spotlight the big political fights, the new record on energy, the economy, and conservation offers many positive reasons to observe the first 100 days.

A highlight was Day 7, when the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency reconsidered a previous biased decision preventing 14 states from reducing CO2 from cars and light trucks.

On Day 29, Colorado was the location to sign into law the single largest green funding initiative in American history, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which doubles America’s commitment to renewable energy production, improves the wise use of existing fuels, increases energy efficiency, and invests in clean transportation — all while creating 1.5 million energy jobs.

On Day 38, a national budget was unveiled that sets the stage for a national energy independence plan that reduces CO2 emissions and drives the nation to a modern and balanced energy economy.

That’s only three of dozens of environmental first days; yet, there is more work to do. The renewed national promise of energy innovation, invention, and independence lies before us.

During the first 100 days, the nation has set itself on a new direction when it comes to protecting our national heritage, natural preservation, and growing the economy through reconstruction and efficiency while reducing waste. I hope that the next 1,325 days are as productive as the first 100.

Lou Villaire
The Grand Junction Free Press, Letters to the Editor, Friday May 8 2009

Monday, May 4, 2009

Encana Energy Expo in Rifle to feature Natural Gas Technology and Alternative Energies

Sponsored by EnCana and free to attendees, the 7th annual Energy Expo gives an up-close look at the technology and skilled workforce responsible for developing clean domestic energy in Western Colorado. It takes place Wednesday, May 6th, from noon to 5 p.m. at the Garfield County Fairgrounds.

The Energy Expo is a great opportunity for people who live and work in the area to talk one-on-one with representatives from EnCana and numerous other local operators, contractor companies, work force-training groups, government and regulatory agencies and alternative energy companies.

“There have been a lot of changes in the last year, in the way Colorado’s energy resources are developed,” said Kathy Friesen, Education Advisor and Expo Director. “The Expo continues to be an educational forum for the community to gain first-hand knowledge about the natural gas industry, environmental initiatives and alternative energy. We encourage everyone to come out and ask questions.”

Emerging technology exhibits are a critical component of the Expo and this year is no different with EnCana debuting one of their natural gas fleet vehicles, the Honda Civic GX. EnCana recently launched its Drive NGV employee program and hasintroduced a small fleet of business and commuter-use natural gas powered vehicles to its employees to help increase awareness for the virtues of natural gas and its versatility as the cleanest commercially available fuel choice.

With more than 80 exhibits, the 7th Annual Energy Expo is on track to be the most informative expo yet. For more information, please contact EnCana at (970) 2....

EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnCana Corporation. With an enterprise value of approximately US$40 billion, EnCana is a leading North American unconventional natural gas and integrated oil company. By partnering with employees, community organizations and other businesses, EnCana contributes to the strength and sustainability of the communities where it operates. EnCana common shares trade on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under the symbol ECA. For more information, go to www.encana.com [2] or call 866-896-6371.